Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
DynamicDeck provides the user with a custom setting and view page where the user can add an objects with its respective fields to the list view with more than 15 fields. Also provides export functionality.
| Authvia | DynamicDeck | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution | DynamicDeck |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 9 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2022 | Jun 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs DynamicDeck's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, DynamicDeck offers a free tier (free) while Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — DynamicDeck's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution audit • DynamicDeck audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Authvia | DynamicDeck |
|---|---|---|
| view of | Not ranked | #2 |
| payment | #4 | Not ranked |
| provides | Not ranked | #4 |
| vendor payments | #8 | Not ranked |
| inline editing | Not ranked | #8 |
DynamicDeck is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution does carry the larger published review base (9 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution has the deeper published review base (9 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). DynamicDeck typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution and DynamicDeck both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from DynamicDeck" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
