Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Plan, schedule, visualize, and interact with your data. Connect any object to boost visibility and productivity. Grid, Matrix, Scheduler, Kanban & Gantt charts. Instant edit, create, resources, rooms, workforce, shifts, events, manufacture, project
| Native Planner Plus | Map Of Things | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
With the Map Of Things, not only you can see the records as map markers, also it brings the real-time location tracking feature. Once the location data of records have been changed, map markers will dynamically move in real-time.
| Metric | Native Planner Plus | Map Of Things |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 20 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2022 | Jul 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Native Planner Plus is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Map Of Things's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Map Of Things offers a free tier (free) while Native Planner Plus starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Native Planner Plus; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Map Of Things's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Native Planner Plus's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Native Planner Plus audit • Map Of Things audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Native Planner Plus | Map Of Things |
|---|---|---|
| schedules | #2 | Not ranked |
| product development | #3 | Not ranked |
| field service management | #7 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Map Of Things is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Native Planner Plus starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Native Planner Plus does carry the larger published review base (20 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Native Planner Plus has the deeper published review base (20 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Native Planner Plus typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (20 reviews). Map Of Things typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Native Planner Plus and Map Of Things both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Map Of Things" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.