Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
* Real-Time and Batch Address Verification * Global Addressing - Supported 245 Countries and Territories * Postal Certified * Email & Phone Verification * Company Name & ABN lookup * Classic / Lightning Ready
| Global Address Validation | AVATAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Global Address Validation | AVATAR |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 10 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2012 | Sep 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Global Address Validation is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs AVATAR's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, AVATAR offers a free tier (freemium) while Global Address Validation starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Global Address Validation; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — AVATAR's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Global Address Validation's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Global Address Validation audit • AVATAR audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Global Address Validation | AVATAR |
|---|---|---|
| address verification | #4 | Not ranked |
| address validation | #4 | Not ranked |
| phone and address | #5 | Not ranked |
| scoring | Not ranked | #5 |
| lead distribution | Not ranked | #7 |
AVATAR is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Global Address Validation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Global Address Validation does carry the larger published review base (10 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Global Address Validation has the deeper published review base (10 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Global Address Validation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). AVATAR typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Global Address Validation and AVATAR both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from AVATAR" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
