Loading content…
Cloudingo vs User Fields History Tracking
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cloudingo | User Fields History Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cloudingo | User Fields History Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Want to know who changed your user role in production? Or want to track user field history? No need to comb through manual audit trails. Just install the app and enable field for history tracking.
| Metric | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality | User Fields History Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 559 | 5 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2012 | Nov 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs User Fields History Tracking's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, User Fields History Tracking offers a free tier (free) while Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. User Fields History Tracking's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — User Fields History Tracking's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit • User Fields History Tracking audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Cloudingo | User Fields History Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| salesforce data | #1 | Not ranked |
| inventory management | #1 | Not ranked |
| meta | Not ranked | #1 |
| management system | #2 | Not ranked |
| custom fields | Not ranked | #2 |
User Fields History Tracking is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 559 reviews) compared to User Fields History Tracking (4.2★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). User Fields History Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality and User Fields History Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from User Fields History Tracking" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.