Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Want to know who changed your user role in production? Or want to track user field history? No need to comb through manual audit trails. Just install the app and enable field for history tracking.
| User Fields History Tracking | Geopointe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | User Fields History Tracking | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 931 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2022 | May 2010 |
Based on the data on this page, Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs User Fields History Tracking's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, User Fields History Tracking offers a free tier (free) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. User Fields History Tracking's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — User Fields History Tracking's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: User Fields History Tracking audit • Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | User Fields History Tracking | Geopointe |
|---|---|---|
| meta | #1 | Not ranked |
| plan | Not ranked | #1 |
| data from | Not ranked | #1 |
| insights and | Not ranked | #1 |
| custom fields | #2 | Not ranked |
User Fields History Tracking is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 931 reviews) compared to User Fields History Tracking (4.2★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
User Fields History Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. User Fields History Tracking and Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from User Fields History Tracking" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.