Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Enable your supply managers to leverage EcoVadis sustainability ratings to monitor your upstream value chain directly in the context of your Salesforce supplier data. Documentation can be found in the Customization Guides section below.
| Metric | EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 9 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 11 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2021 | Oct 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Print is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 5.0★ vs EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings offers a free tier (free) while Print starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Print; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Print's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings audit • Print audit
| EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Print starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Print has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 9 reviews) compared to EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings (3.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Print is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Print has more onboarding documentation maturity (9 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2 reviews). Print aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (9 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings and Print both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from EcoVadis Sustainability Ratings" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.