Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Leading Salesforce SharePoint integration and document automation tool. Built-in Flow actions to automate folder creation, sync record permissions, and share files from records with tracked access. Supports S3, Google Drive, Azure Blob and more.
| CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform | Print for ERP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Drive efficiency for your ERP printing with automated remote printing directly out of Salesforce. Print for ERP was designed specifically for Rootstock ERP customer for rapid deployment using turnkey functionally.
| Metric | CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform | Print for ERP |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 160 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 7 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2022 | Jan 2023 |
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform and Print for ERP are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Print for ERP offers a free tier (free) while CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Print for ERP's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform audit • Print for ERP audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform | Print for ERP |
|---|---|---|
| salesforce objects | #1 | Not ranked |
| access | #1 | Not ranked |
| cloudfiles | #2 | Not ranked |
| designed to | Not ranked | #5 |
| erp and | Not ranked | #7 |
No tracked changes.
Print for ERP is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform (5.0★, 160 reviews) and Print for ERP (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Print for ERP holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform has the deeper published review base (160 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (160 reviews). Print for ERP typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform and Print for ERP both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Print for ERP" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.