Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The Lightning Following Report App enables to see all the records you're following in one place. It provides an easy way to unfollow a record that was previously being followed. Filter the following records based on the object type (Standard & Custom).
| Lightning Following Report | Alfred | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | Lightning Following Report | Alfred |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 17 | ★ 19 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | — | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 15 supported |
| Listed since | May 2021 | May 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Alfred is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Lightning Following Report's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Lightning Following Report at free, Alfred at freemium. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Alfred; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lightning Following Report's 17-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Alfred's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Lightning Following Report audit • Alfred audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Lightning Following Report | Alfred |
|---|---|---|
| 500 following limit | #3 | Not ranked |
| updates | Not ranked | #3 |
| chatter unfollow rules | #4 | Not ranked |
| your own | Not ranked | #8 |
| video calls | Not ranked | #8 |
No tracked changes.
Both Lightning Following Report and Alfred offer paid plans only. Lightning Following Report starts at free; Alfred starts at freemium. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Alfred has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 19 reviews) compared to Lightning Following Report (4.2★ from 17 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Alfred holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Alfred has the deeper published review base (19 vs 17), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Lightning Following Report typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). Alfred typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (19 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Lightning Following Report and Alfred both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lightning Following Report" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.