OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce vs CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform

Based on the data on this page, CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce at paid, CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce or CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform cheaper?

Both OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce and CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform offer paid plans only. OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce starts at paid; CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce or CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform does carry the larger published review base (160 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce or CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform has the deeper published review base (160 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

OpenText Content Services | Shared application for Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (160 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.