Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Update for the number of user licenses in a salesforce account. Get the count of active user licenses in your salesforce account. Automatically removes the user package when you deactivate any account.
| DS Salesforce Licence Tracker | Time Warp | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | DS Salesforce Licence Tracker | Time Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 7 | ★ 89 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | free |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2022 | Nov 2020 |
DS Salesforce Licence Tracker edges out Time Warp on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: DS Salesforce Licence Tracker at free, Time Warp at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to DS Salesforce Licence Tracker; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Time Warp's 89-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than DS Salesforce Licence Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: DS Salesforce Licence Tracker audit • Time Warp audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | DS Salesforce Licence Tracker | Time Warp |
|---|---|---|
| user | #2 | Not ranked |
| time to value | Not ranked | #2 |
| view of | Not ranked | #2 |
| related | Not ranked | #3 |
| salesforce account | #5 | Not ranked |
Both DS Salesforce Licence Tracker and Time Warp offer paid plans only. DS Salesforce Licence Tracker starts at free; Time Warp starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
DS Salesforce Licence Tracker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 7 reviews) compared to Time Warp (4.7★ from 89 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
DS Salesforce Licence Tracker holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Time Warp has the deeper published review base (89 vs 7), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
DS Salesforce Licence Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). Time Warp typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (89 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. DS Salesforce Licence Tracker and Time Warp both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from DS Salesforce Licence Tracker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
