Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Social Sharing for your community pages! Circle/Square social icons, various layout options, and works in any region in your community!
| Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) | Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Our open source CMS components complement the standard CMS components provided by Salesforce, displaying dynamically-selected "virtual collections" of CMS articles on topic and record pages.
| Metric | Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) | Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 3.8 ★ | 1.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4 | 1 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | free |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2020 | Feb 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 3.8★ vs Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) at free, Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR); mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) audit • Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) | Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack |
|---|---|---|
| feeds | #12 | #6 |
Both Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) and Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack offer paid plans only. Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) starts at free; Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) has the higher average rating (3.8★ from 4 reviews) compared to Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack (1.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) holds the higher average rating (3.8★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) has the deeper published review base (4 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Social Sharing for Experience Cloud (Aura/LWR) and Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Salesforce CMS Component Starter Pack" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.