Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
This component lets you associate YouTube and/or externally hosted videos to your products. Display your videos in an accordion or tabular format.
| Oktana RSS Feed | B2B LE Video Player | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
Now you can keep up with your favorite news feeds without having to leave Salesforce. It's challenging to sort through all the information coming at you daily, but now you can track up to 5 sources where you spend most of your time.
| Metric | Oktana RSS Feed | B2B LE Video Player |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 3 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | free |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2021 | Jan 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, Oktana RSS Feed is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.0★ vs B2B LE Video Player's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Oktana RSS Feed at free, B2B LE Video Player at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Oktana RSS Feed; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — B2B LE Video Player's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Oktana RSS Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Oktana RSS Feed audit • B2B LE Video Player audit
| — |
| Keyword | Oktana RSS Feed | B2B LE Video Player |
|---|---|---|
| feeds | #3 | #10 |
| feed | #5 | #12 |
Both Oktana RSS Feed and B2B LE Video Player offer paid plans only. Oktana RSS Feed starts at free; B2B LE Video Player starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Oktana RSS Feed has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to B2B LE Video Player (3.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Oktana RSS Feed holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. B2B LE Video Player has the deeper published review base (3 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Oktana RSS Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). B2B LE Video Player typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Oktana RSS Feed and B2B LE Video Player both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Oktana RSS Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.