Loading content…
Geopointe vs Custom Object Teams
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Geopointe | Custom Object Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Geopointe | Custom Object Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Custom Teams is a simple yet powerful tool to maintain access to Private Custom Objects with Team Members. For example, Project Teams, Proposal Teams etc. Provide and revoke access to a single or group of users to a Private Custom Object.
| Metric | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation | Custom Object Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 931 | 8 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2010 | Jan 2021 |
Custom Object Teams edges out Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Custom Object Teams offers a free tier (free) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Custom Object Teams's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Custom Object Teams; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's 931-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Custom Object Teams's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit • Custom Object Teams audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Geopointe | Custom Object Teams |
|---|---|---|
| plan | #1 | Not ranked |
| data from | #1 | Not ranked |
| insights and | #1 | Not ranked |
| or custom | Not ranked | #1 |
| and custom | Not ranked | #1 |
Custom Object Teams is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Custom Object Teams has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation (4.9★ from 931 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Custom Object Teams holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). Custom Object Teams typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation and Custom Object Teams both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Custom Object Teams" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.