Loading content…
Grids vs Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Grids | Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Grids | Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
It is a lightning component for the developers to use for any scenario where they need to add a multi-select lookup component. It will reduce the efforts of the developer and is also generic.
| Metric | Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management | Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 59 | 10 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2021 | Nov 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component offers a free tier (free) while Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management audit • Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Grids | Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component |
|---|---|---|
| this component | Not ranked | #1 |
| component which | Not ranked | #1 |
| component | Not ranked | #1 |
| interface | #2 | Not ranked |
| inline editing | #2 | Not ranked |
Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 59 reviews) compared to Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component (4.1★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management has the deeper published review base (59 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (59 reviews). Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management and Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Multi-Select Lookup Pill Component" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.