Loading content…
PENTALYM™ vs Authvia
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| PENTALYM™ | Authvia | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| PENTALYM™ | Authvia | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | PENTALYM™ | Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 9 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | freemium | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2022 | Sep 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs PENTALYM™'s 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, PENTALYM™ offers a free tier (freemium) while Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PENTALYM™'s 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PENTALYM™ audit • Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PENTALYM™ | Authvia |
|---|---|---|
| payment | Not ranked | #4 |
| vendor payments | Not ranked | #8 |
| inventory data | #10 | Not ranked |
| payment processing | Not ranked | #12 |
PENTALYM™ is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution has the deeper published review base (9 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
PENTALYM™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PENTALYM™ and Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PENTALYM™" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.