Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| B2B CPQ Configurator | Chargent Payment Processing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — |
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
| Metric | B2B CPQ Configurator | Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.0 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 529 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 2 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2021 | Mar 2009 |
Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.9★ vs B2B CPQ Configurator's 2.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, B2B CPQ Configurator offers a free tier (free) while Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. B2B CPQ Configurator's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — B2B CPQ Configurator's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: B2B CPQ Configurator audit • Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments audit
| Keyword | B2B CPQ Configurator | Chargent Payment Processing |
|---|---|---|
| ecommerce | Not ranked | #1 |
| commerce cloud | Not ranked | #1 |
| in real time | Not ranked | #1 |
| product configurator | #2 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
B2B CPQ Configurator is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 529 reviews) compared to B2B CPQ Configurator (2.0★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. B2B CPQ Configurator fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (529 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
B2B CPQ Configurator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3 reviews). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (529 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. B2B CPQ Configurator and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from B2B CPQ Configurator" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
