Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cloudingo | in.bounz | Inbound email automation. | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
✔ Works with Outlook and every IMAP-supported mail provider (Gmail, ...) ✔ Store emails contextually in Salesforce ✔ Create automated tasks from emails ✔ Seamless history of relevant emails ✔ Upload files & store them in objects ✔ 100% customizable
| Metric | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality | in.bounz | Inbound email automation. |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 559 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2012 | Aug 2022 |
in.bounz | Inbound email automation. edges out Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality at paid, in.bounz | Inbound email automation. at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. in.bounz | Inbound email automation.'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to in.bounz | Inbound email automation.; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's 559-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than in.bounz | Inbound email automation.'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit • in.bounz | Inbound email automation. audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Cloudingo | in.bounz | Inbound email automation. |
|---|---|---|
| salesforce data | #1 | Not ranked |
| inventory management | #1 | Not ranked |
| management system | #2 | Not ranked |
| 30-day free trial | Not ranked | #2 |
| production trial try | Not ranked | #4 |
Both Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality and in.bounz | Inbound email automation. offer paid plans only. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid; in.bounz | Inbound email automation. starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
in.bounz | Inbound email automation. has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality (4.8★ from 559 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
in.bounz | Inbound email automation. holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). in.bounz | Inbound email automation. typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality and in.bounz | Inbound email automation. both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from in.bounz | Inbound email automation." in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
