Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The CMS Content Type Manager gives you a convenient point-and-click way to manage all your content types right inside Lightning Experience.
| CMS Content Type Manager | CloudFiles Generate & Automate | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Salesforce DocGen for PDF, Word, Excel & PowerPoint. Build no-code document generation templates, then generate quotes, invoices, proposals, contracts etc., on demand or in bulk. AI powered, native, DocuSign, CPQ & compliance. PDF generator & more.
| Metric | CMS Content Type Manager | CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 79 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 4 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2020 | May 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs CMS Content Type Manager's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, CMS Content Type Manager offers a free tier (free) while CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CMS Content Type Manager's 25-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CMS Content Type Manager audit • CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | CMS Content Type Manager | CloudFiles Generate & Automate |
|---|---|---|
| content | #1 | Not ranked |
| productivity | #2 | Not ranked |
| cloudfiles document | Not ranked | #3 |
| automate document | Not ranked | #3 |
| automate document generation | Not ranked | #4 |
No tracked changes.
CMS Content Type Manager is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 79 reviews) compared to CMS Content Type Manager (3.8★ from 25 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature has the deeper published review base (79 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
CMS Content Type Manager typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (79 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CMS Content Type Manager and CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CMS Content Type Manager" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
