Loading content…
Cloudingo vs Einstein Intent Assessor
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cloudingo | Einstein Intent Assessor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cloudingo | Einstein Intent Assessor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
This Einstein Analytics template helps you visualize the accuracy of you Einstein Language Intent Models. You can quickly identify specific labels and utterances your model is struggling to classify.
| Metric | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality | Einstein Intent Assessor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 559 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2012 | Apr 2020 |
Einstein Intent Assessor edges out Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Einstein Intent Assessor offers a free tier (free) while Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Einstein Intent Assessor's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Einstein Intent Assessor; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's 559-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Einstein Intent Assessor's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit • Einstein Intent Assessor audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Cloudingo | Einstein Intent Assessor |
|---|---|---|
| salesforce data | #1 | Not ranked |
| inventory management | #1 | Not ranked |
| management system | #2 | Not ranked |
| model | Not ranked | #2 |
| admin improving accuracy | Not ranked | #3 |
Einstein Intent Assessor is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Einstein Intent Assessor has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality (4.8★ from 559 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Einstein Intent Assessor holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). Einstein Intent Assessor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality and Einstein Intent Assessor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Einstein Intent Assessor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.