Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Integrate Acrobat Sign with Salesforce to create 100% digital workflows in minutes. Create, send, sign, track, and file agreements quickly & securely right in Salesforce. Download the free plug-in, then purchase Acrobat Sign or start a free 30-day trial.
| Lightning Messaging Utility | Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Whether you're a Salesforce Admin or Developer - the way you deliver messages to your users is key to building a user-friendly app! Lighting Messaging Utility gives you the tools you need to build clean and consistent messages at all times!
| Metric | Lightning Messaging Utility | Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.4 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 19 | ★ 3.2k |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 2 | ★ 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2020 | Oct 2006 |
Based on the data on this page, Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.9★ vs Lightning Messaging Utility's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Lightning Messaging Utility offers a free tier (free) while Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce has the larger user base (3,200 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lightning Messaging Utility's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lightning Messaging Utility's 19-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Lightning Messaging Utility audit • Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Lightning Messaging Utility | Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| sign app | #89 | #1 |
No tracked changes.
Lightning Messaging Utility is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 3,200 reviews) compared to Lightning Messaging Utility (3.4★ from 19 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Lightning Messaging Utility fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,200 reviews vs 19), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Lightning Messaging Utility typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (19 reviews). Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3,200 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Lightning Messaging Utility and Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lightning Messaging Utility" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.