Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1.Engine for running/managing asynchronous processes 2.Tool for building and running asynchronous processes without code
| GridMate | Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar | Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 133 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2019 | Feb 2022 |
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar and Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator offers a free tier (free) while GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar has the larger user base (133 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar audit • Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | GridMate | Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator |
|---|---|---|
| inline editing | #1 | Not ranked |
| view of | #1 | Not ranked |
| provides | #1 | Not ranked |
| without coding | Not ranked | #8 |
| form creator | Not ranked | #70 |
No tracked changes.
Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar (5.0★, 133 reviews) and Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar does carry the larger published review base (133 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar has the deeper published review base (133 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (133 reviews). Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar and Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Asynchronous Process Manager / Creator" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
