Loading content…
GridMate vs CMS Content Type Manager
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| GridMate | CMS Content Type Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| GridMate | CMS Content Type Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
The CMS Content Type Manager gives you a convenient point-and-click way to manage all your content types right inside Lightning Experience.
| Metric | GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar | CMS Content Type Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 133 | 25 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2019 | Apr 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs CMS Content Type Manager's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, CMS Content Type Manager offers a free tier (free) while GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar has the larger user base (133 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CMS Content Type Manager's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CMS Content Type Manager's 25-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar audit • CMS Content Type Manager audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | GridMate | CMS Content Type Manager |
|---|---|---|
| productivity | #4 | #21 |
No tracked changes.
CMS Content Type Manager is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 133 reviews) compared to CMS Content Type Manager (3.8★ from 25 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar has the deeper published review base (133 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (133 reviews). CMS Content Type Manager typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar and CMS Content Type Manager both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CMS Content Type Manager" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.