Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| eSpatial | Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Updated April 2022 to support Person Accounts! The Account Map is intended to be a simple and straightforward "Google Map" App. Choose color for locations, create list views on the Account Object or build queries inside the App. 100% free.
| Metric | eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF | Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 2.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 10 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2018 | Mar 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce's 2.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce offers a free tier (free) while eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF audit • Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | eSpatial | Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| optimize routes | #2 | Not ranked |
| routes | #6 | Not ranked |
| google analytics | Not ranked | #7 |
| google maps | Not ranked | #8 |
| geolocation | #11 | Not ranked |
Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce (2.4★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce has the deeper published review base (10 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF and Google Dynamic Account Mapping inside Salesforce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.