Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
ActiveCampaign is the autonomous marketing platform built to transform how marketers, agencies, and business owners work. Use Active Intelligence to power goal-aware automations and orchestrate personalized experiences across email, SMS, and WhatsApp.
| ActiveCampaign | Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Bridge Salesforce to the Engaging Networks Fundraising and Advocacy platform with our flexible and customizable Salesforce Connector. Our platform makes it easy for nonprofits to build and maintain personalized relationships with their supporters.
| Metric | ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce | Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 156 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 6 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2019 | Sep 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce at paid, Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce has the larger user base (156 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce's 156-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce audit • Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | ActiveCampaign | Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector |
|---|---|---|
| marketing platform | #3 | #9 |
| marketing platform for | #3 | #9 |
| mass emails | #3 | #12 |
| salesforce platform | #11 | #4 |
| platform for | #4 | #12 |
No tracked changes.
Both ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce and Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector offer paid plans only. ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce starts at paid; Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce (4.2★ from 156 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce has the deeper published review base (156 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (156 reviews). Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ActiveCampaign: Customer Experience Marketing Automation for Salesforce and Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.