Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LuGo-Test | Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Mployee by Bullhorn offers two packages for the staffing & recruiting market: Staffing and Secondment. Both packages offer features for your front- (ATS/CRM) and your mid-office (onboarding, contracting, assignment management and time & money).
| Metric | LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments | Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 11 | 9 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 13 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2011 | Jul 2020 |
LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments and Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments at paid, Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments audit • Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | LuGo-Test | Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) |
|---|---|---|
| front office | Not ranked | #3 |
| trial today | #5 | Not ranked |
| average | #7 | Not ranked |
| middle and back | Not ranked | #7 |
| without coding | #8 | Not ranked |
Both LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments and Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) offer paid plans only. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments starts at paid; Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments (5.0★, 11 reviews) and Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) (5.0★, 9 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments does carry the larger published review base (11 vs 9). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments has the deeper published review base (11 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments and Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mployee Staffing & Recruitment (front- and mid-office)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
