Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Quick Creator provides an optimized solution for creating custom objects and custom fields in a few clicks.
| DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service | Quick Creator | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Drag & drop resources to visually balance your workload. Share and publish your schedules. Work with Google and MS365 calendars and any Salesforce objects. Customize your display, rules, automations, and workflows from our extension library.
| Metric | DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service | Quick Creator |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 44 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2016 | Jun 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Quick Creator's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Quick Creator offers a free tier (free) while DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Quick Creator's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service audit • Quick Creator audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service | Quick Creator |
|---|---|---|
| objects and fields | Not ranked | #1 |
| custom objects | Not ranked | #1 |
| objects fields | Not ranked | #1 |
| calendars | #2 | Not ranked |
| resource scheduling | #4 | Not ranked |
Quick Creator is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service does carry the larger published review base (44 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service has the deeper published review base (44 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (44 reviews). Quick Creator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. DayBack Calendar - Resource Scheduling, Project Management, Field Service and Quick Creator both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Quick Creator" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.