Urban-Hawks vs Field Service Management for Salesforce

Based on the data on this page, Urban-Hawks is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Field Service Management for Salesforce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Urban-Hawks at paid, Field Service Management for Salesforce at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Urban-Hawks; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Field Service Management for Salesforce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Urban-Hawks's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Urban-Hawks or Field Service Management for Salesforce cheaper?

Both Urban-Hawks and Field Service Management for Salesforce offer paid plans only. Urban-Hawks starts at paid; Field Service Management for Salesforce starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose Urban-Hawks or Field Service Management for Salesforce?

Urban-Hawks holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Urban-Hawks or Field Service Management for Salesforce?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Urban-Hawks has the deeper published review base (9 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Urban-Hawks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). Field Service Management for Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Urban-Hawks and Field Service Management for Salesforce?

Migration support varies by app and category. Urban-Hawks and Field Service Management for Salesforce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Field Service Management for Salesforce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.