Loading content…
Cloudingo vs User Access Report
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cloudingo | User Access Report | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cloudingo | User Access Report | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
The Authenticated and Guest User Access Report and Monitoring package gives you a visual overview of all objects, records, and permissions that the running user has access to. Full Documentation: https://useraccessreportandmonitoring.substack.com/
| Metric | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality | User Access Report |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 559 | 11 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2012 | Jan 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs User Access Report's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, User Access Report offers a free tier (free) while Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 11), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. User Access Report's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — User Access Report's 11-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit • User Access Report audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Cloudingo | User Access Report |
|---|---|---|
| salesforce data | #1 | Not ranked |
| inventory management | #1 | Not ranked |
| user access | Not ranked | #1 |
| management system | #2 | Not ranked |
| and access | Not ranked | #2 |
User Access Report is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 559 reviews) compared to User Access Report (3.0★ from 11 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 11), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). User Access Report typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality and User Access Report both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from User Access Report" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.