Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The 'Ideas for Lightning Communities' Tab is an easy way to access the Community of Users who can post, vote for, and comment on Ideas without switching back to Salesforce Classic.
| Ideas for Lightning Communities | Mango Map | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Ideas for Lightning Communities | Mango Map |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.5 ★ | ★ 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | 2 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | free |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2019 | May 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Mango Map is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 3.0★ vs Ideas for Lightning Communities's 1.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Ideas for Lightning Communities at free, Mango Map at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Mango Map; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ideas for Lightning Communities's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mango Map's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ideas for Lightning Communities audit • Mango Map audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Ideas for Lightning Communities | Mango Map |
|---|---|---|
| ideas ultimate | #6 | Not ranked |
| ideas | #6 | Not ranked |
| record detail pages | Not ranked | #7 |
| community of users | #8 | Not ranked |
| record detail | Not ranked | #10 |
Both Ideas for Lightning Communities and Mango Map offer paid plans only. Ideas for Lightning Communities starts at free; Mango Map starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Mango Map has the higher average rating (3.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Ideas for Lightning Communities (1.5★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mango Map holds the higher average rating (3.0★ vs 1.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly, and the Salesforce AppExchange publishes no review base that would let us infer it for these two — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Ideas for Lightning Communities typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Mango Map typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ideas for Lightning Communities and Mango Map both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mango Map" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.