Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks vs LuGo-Test

Based on the data on this page, LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks's 2.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks at paid, LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments cheaper?

Both Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks and LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments offer paid plans only. Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks starts at paid; LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments?

LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 11 reviews) compared to Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks (2.8★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments?

LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments has the deeper published review base (11 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.