Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Capture Activities directly to Salesforce without compromises with the most robust integration. ✅ Sync Emails, Calendars, Leads on your own terms. ✅ 100% customizable ✅ Custom object supported ✅ Flexible deployment options ✅ 14 day Free trial
Boost development of your custom components with a new powerful lookup component. It looks like a standard one, it is very simple in customization and it works everywhere - even on Salesforce1.
| Metric | Lightning Universal Lookup Component | Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 58 | ★ 512 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2017 | Sep 2015 |
Based on the data on this page, Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.8★ vs Lightning Universal Lookup Component's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Lightning Universal Lookup Component at free, Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid at freemium. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the larger user base (512 reviews vs 58), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lightning Universal Lookup Component's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lightning Universal Lookup Component's 58-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Lightning Universal Lookup Component audit • Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid audit
| Lightning Universal Lookup Component | Outlook Integration for | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Keyword | Lightning Universal Lookup Component | Outlook Integration for |
|---|---|---|
| freeform | #82 | #5 |
Both Lightning Universal Lookup Component and Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid offer paid plans only. Lightning Universal Lookup Component starts at free; Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid starts at freemium. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 512 reviews) compared to Lightning Universal Lookup Component (4.4★ from 58 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Lightning Universal Lookup Component fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has more onboarding documentation maturity (512 reviews vs 58), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Lightning Universal Lookup Component typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (58 reviews). Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (512 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Lightning Universal Lookup Component and Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lightning Universal Lookup Component" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.