Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Manage 1:1 or Team Meetings (Sales, Marketing, Managers or any Team) Designed and natively build in Salesforce - Meeting Agenda - Action Items - Meeting Minutes/Notes - Meeting Templates - Recurring Meetings with Automatic Carry-forward Open items
| Proton Text | Meetings - 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
SMS/MMS Text Lightning Component with Integration to Salesforce® Objects. 1-to-1 texting with optional Google Translate and Sms2Agent features. Proton Blaster handles bulk SMS to thousands, and our automation library makes SMS part of your workflow.
| Metric | Proton Text | Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 30 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 5 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2018 | Aug 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Proton Text is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 5.0★ vs Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes offers a free tier (free) while Proton Text starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Proton Text; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Proton Text's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Proton Text audit • Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Proton Text | Meetings - 1 |
|---|---|---|
| lead | #22 | Not ranked |
| appointment | #31 | Not ranked |
| workflow | #73 | Not ranked |
| feedback | Not ranked | #117 |
Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Proton Text starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Proton Text has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 30 reviews) compared to Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes (4.0★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Proton Text fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Proton Text has more onboarding documentation maturity (30 reviews vs 4), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Proton Text typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (30 reviews). Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Proton Text and Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Meetings - 1:1, Team, Cross-functional Meetings with Agenda, Action Items, Notes" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
