Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Analyse Salesforce field usage, population, dependencies, layout visibility, and risk to identify low-value fields, support safer clean up decisions, and reduce manual review effort across your org.
| FieldPro | Field Trip Analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | FieldPro | Field Trip Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 40 | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | freemium | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2018 | Aug 2026 |
Based on the data on this page, FieldPro is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.6★ vs Field Trip Analysis's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, FieldPro offers a free tier (freemium) while Field Trip Analysis starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to FieldPro; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Field Trip Analysis's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than FieldPro's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FieldPro audit • Field Trip Analysis audit
| — |
| Keyword | FieldPro | Field Trip Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| analyse salesforce field | #3 | #21 |
| field usage | #1 | #5 |
| your field | #1 | #8 |
| field | #1 | #10 |
FieldPro is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Field Trip Analysis starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
FieldPro holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. FieldPro has the deeper published review base (40 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
FieldPro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (40 reviews). Field Trip Analysis typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FieldPro and Field Trip Analysis both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Field Trip Analysis" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
