| FieldPro | Metadata Explorer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
A powerful Lightning tool for exploring and analyzing 14+ Salesforce metadata types including Apex Classes, Triggers, Profiles, Permission Sets, and Custom Objects. Quickly view, search, and understand your org's metadata without writing SOQL queries.
| Metric | FieldPro | Metadata Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 40 | 1 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | freemium | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2018 | Dec 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Metadata Explorer is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs FieldPro's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: FieldPro at freemium, Metadata Explorer at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Metadata Explorer; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — FieldPro's 40-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Metadata Explorer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FieldPro audit • Metadata Explorer audit
| — |
| Keyword | FieldPro | Metadata Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| https calendly | #1 | Not ranked |
| your field | #1 | Not ranked |
| field | #1 | Not ranked |
| metadata and | Not ranked | #1 |
| metadata | Not ranked | #1 |
No tracked changes.
Both FieldPro and Metadata Explorer offer paid plans only. FieldPro starts at freemium; Metadata Explorer starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Metadata Explorer has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to FieldPro (4.6★ from 40 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Metadata Explorer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. FieldPro has the deeper published review base (40 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
FieldPro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (40 reviews). Metadata Explorer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FieldPro and Metadata Explorer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Metadata Explorer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.