Loading content…
eSpatial vs Live Location Tracking
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| eSpatial | Live Location Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| eSpatial | Live Location Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
This component tracks the current location of the user every 20 seconds and updates the route traveling to reach the destination.The destination address is the service appointment address and the source address is the current location.
| Metric | eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF | Live Location Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 1.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 3 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2018 | Jan 2018 |
Based on the data on this page, eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Live Location Tracking's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Live Location Tracking offers a free tier (free) while eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Live Location Tracking's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF audit • Live Location Tracking audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | eSpatial | Live Location Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| current location | Not ranked | #1 |
| within | #2 | Not ranked |
| optimize routes | #2 | Not ranked |
| mapping | #5 | Not ranked |
| route | Not ranked | #5 |
Live Location Tracking is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Live Location Tracking (1.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF has the deeper published review base (3 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Live Location Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. eSpatial: The Complete Sales Optimization Mapping Tool Within And Outside SF and Live Location Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Live Location Tracking" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.