Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Urban-Hawks is cloud-based field service web application. Giving companies an ability to increase profitability, generate more revenue, simplify processes & increase customer satisfaction. Urban Hawks helps to increase daily work order completion.
| Urban-Hawks | TrackJack | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Urban-Hawks | TrackJack |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 9 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 2 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2017 | Sep 2020 |
Urban-Hawks and TrackJack are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Urban-Hawks at paid, TrackJack at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Urban-Hawks audit • TrackJack audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
No features listed.
| Keyword | Urban-Hawks | TrackJack |
|---|---|---|
| fleet | #8 | #1 |
Both Urban-Hawks and TrackJack offer paid plans only. Urban-Hawks starts at paid; TrackJack starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Urban-Hawks (5.0★, 9 reviews) and TrackJack (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. Urban-Hawks does carry the larger published review base (9 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Urban-Hawks has the deeper published review base (9 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Urban-Hawks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). TrackJack typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Urban-Hawks and TrackJack both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from TrackJack" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.