Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Gimbal Inventory is a 100% native application on the Salesforce platform providing accuracy, simplicity, and visibility into your inventory.
| Gimbal Inventory | Arka Inventory Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
Arka Inventory is an AI enabled inventory, warehouse, purchase & cost management solution native to Salesforce cloud platform. It helps you better understand your product costs, get better visibility to inventories in every location.
| Metric | Gimbal Inventory | Arka Inventory Management |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 46 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2017 | Aug 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, Arka Inventory Management is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Gimbal Inventory's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Gimbal Inventory at paid, Arka Inventory Management at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Arka Inventory Management; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gimbal Inventory's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Arka Inventory Management's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gimbal Inventory audit • Arka Inventory Management audit
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | Gimbal Inventory | Arka Inventory Management |
|---|---|---|
| and inventory | #4 | #2 |
| inventory | #71 | #2 |
| inventory management | #9 | #2 |
No tracked changes.
Both Gimbal Inventory and Arka Inventory Management offer paid plans only. Gimbal Inventory starts at paid; Arka Inventory Management starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Arka Inventory Management does carry the larger published review base (46 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Arka Inventory Management has the deeper published review base (46 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gimbal Inventory typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Arka Inventory Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (46 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gimbal Inventory and Arka Inventory Management both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gimbal Inventory" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
