Meeting - Collaborate 1 vs Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint

Based on the data on this page, Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting offers a free tier (free) while Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint or Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting cheaper?

Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint or Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint does carry the larger published review base (22 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint or Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint has the deeper published review base (22 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). Meeting - Collaborate 1:1, Team or Cross Functional meeting typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.