Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
AC Fundraising provides Salesforce native solution for managing fundraising campaigns of all kinds. We provide peer-to-peer fundraising functionality where guest users can register, create their own fundraising campaigns, set targets and track donations.
Salesforce-native payment processing for every industry ✔PCI-Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments ✔iOS & Android / Google Mobile Payments w/ Field Service Lightning ✔Recurring Payments ✔PayLink ✔Stripe, Authorize.net, 120+ Gateways
| Metric | Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL | AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 181 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 6 | 6 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2016 | Oct 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 5.0★ vs AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns 's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL at paid, AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL has the larger user base (181 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns 's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns 's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL audit • AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns audit
| Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL | AC Fundraising | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Keyword | Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL | AC Fundraising |
|---|---|---|
| payment form | #28 | Not ranked |
| jotform | #42 | Not ranked |
| poll | #42 | Not ranked |
| donation form | Not ranked | #71 |
Both Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL and AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns offer paid plans only. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL starts at paid; AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL has more onboarding documentation maturity (181 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (181 reviews). AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL and AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from AC Fundraising: Native peer-to-peer and standard fundraising campaigns " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.