AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service vs Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL

Based on the data on this page, Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL at paid, AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL has the larger user base (181 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL or AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service cheaper?

Both Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL and AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service offer paid plans only. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL starts at paid; AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL or AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL does carry the larger published review base (181 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL or AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL has the deeper published review base (181 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Blackthorn Payments - Credit Card Processing, ACH, Subscriptions, FSL typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (181 reviews). AssetOptics for Salesforce Field Service typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.