Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility | Grids | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Never lose track of critical Salesforce changes again. BeanTrail provides unlimited field history tracking, real time visibility, and audit ready insights so you can stay compliant, detect risks early, and trust your data.
| Metric | Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility | Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 32 | ★ 59 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2016 | Aug 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility at paid, Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility's 32-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility audit • Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility | Grids |
|---|---|---|
| jotform | #116 | #86 |
| doc | #118 | #112 |
Both Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility and Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management offer paid plans only. Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility starts at paid; Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 59 reviews) compared to Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility (4.3★ from 32 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management has the deeper published review base (59 vs 32), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (59 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility and Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ultra Field History Tracker – An Unlimited Data Tracking Native Utility" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
