Loading content…
Geopointe vs Field Dependency Finder
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Geopointe | Field Dependency Finder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Geopointe | Field Dependency Finder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
A worthwhile app that quenches your desire of checking dependencies of the custom field(s). With this app not only a technocrat but an administrator can also find field dependency. Figure out all custom fields usage in AVCT components with just a click.
| Metric | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation | Field Dependency Finder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 3.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 931 | 12 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | — |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2010 | Aug 2014 |
Based on the data on this page, Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Field Dependency Finder's 3.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Field Dependency Finder offers a free tier (freemium) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Field Dependency Finder's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Field Dependency Finder's 12-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit • Field Dependency Finder audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
No features listed.
| Keyword | Geopointe | Field Dependency Finder |
|---|---|---|
| field usage | #12 | #4 |
Field Dependency Finder is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 931 reviews) compared to Field Dependency Finder (3.1★ from 12 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). Field Dependency Finder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation and Field Dependency Finder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Field Dependency Finder" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.