Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Emplify | ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
An ATS customizable for how across your recruiting workflows, process, rules. Connect recruiting, sales, and operations in one environment to generate more business, make more placements, and control the operational costs that eat into margins.
| Metric | Emplify | ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 16 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 8 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2014 | Sep 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Emplify's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Emplify offers a free tier (free) while ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Emplify's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Emplify audit • ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Emplify | ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution |
|---|---|---|
| applicant tracking | Not ranked | #5 |
| automation to staffing | Not ranked | #5 |
| recruiting | Not ranked | #6 |
| application | #7 | Not ranked |
| fulfillment | #7 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Emplify is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution does carry the larger published review base (16 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution has the deeper published review base (16 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Emplify typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Emplify and ASYMBL ATS | Recruiting Workflow Solution both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Emplify" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
