Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta vs Mobile Orders (Account Action)

Based on the data on this page, Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Mobile Orders (Account Action)'s 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Mobile Orders (Account Action) offers a free tier (free) while Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta has the larger user base (563 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mobile Orders (Account Action)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Mobile Orders (Account Action)'s 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta or Mobile Orders (Account Action) cheaper?

Mobile Orders (Account Action) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta or Mobile Orders (Account Action)?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta does carry the larger published review base (563 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta or Mobile Orders (Account Action)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta has the deeper published review base (563 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (563 reviews). Mobile Orders (Account Action) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta and Mobile Orders (Account Action)?

Migration support varies by app and category. Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta and Mobile Orders (Account Action) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mobile Orders (Account Action)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.