Loading content…
Cloudingo vs Data.com Prospector Reports
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cloudingo | Data.com Prospector Reports | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cloudingo | Data.com Prospector Reports | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Data.com Prospector Reports is a free package available to organizations that use Data.com Corporate or Premium Prospector. The reports and their associated dashboard provide valuable insight on how Data.com is being used to generate leads and pipeline.
| Metric | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality | Data.com Prospector Reports |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 2.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 559 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2012 | Dec 2013 |
Based on the data on this page, Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Data.com Prospector Reports's 2.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Data.com Prospector Reports offers a free tier (free) while Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Data.com Prospector Reports's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Data.com Prospector Reports's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit • Data.com Prospector Reports audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Cloudingo | Data.com Prospector Reports |
|---|---|---|
| system | #1 | Not ranked |
| creating | #1 | Not ranked |
| salesforce security | #1 | Not ranked |
Data.com Prospector Reports is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 559 reviews) compared to Data.com Prospector Reports (2.5★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 2.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). Data.com Prospector Reports typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality and Data.com Prospector Reports both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Data.com Prospector Reports" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.