Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| CloudComp | Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Incentivize is the 100% native Salesforce App for managing Sales Compensation within your business. Find out how you can save 90% of time on Sales Commission processing! Got a minute? Learn more by clicking "Watch Demo" in the Overview section below!
| Metric | CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM | Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 13 | 11 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 7 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2013 | Nov 2020 |
CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM and Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM at paid, Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM audit • Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | CloudComp | Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize |
|---|---|---|
| compensation | #1 | Not ranked |
| sales compensation | #1 | Not ranked |
| commission management | #1 | Not ranked |
Both CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM and Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize offer paid plans only. CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM starts at paid; Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM (5.0★, 13 reviews) and Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize (4.9★, 11 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM has the deeper published review base (13 vs 11), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM and Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sales Commission Management and Incentive Compensation | Leaptree Incentivize" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
