Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Managing donor and fundraiser data in Salesforce is critical to scaling nonprofit fundraising efforts. The Neon Fundraise app ensures that all team, fundraiser and donation data seamlessly passes back to Salesforce.
| Neon Fundraise | LitNim | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Neon Fundraise | LitNim |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 10 | 10 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free_to_install | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2013 | Feb 2019 |
Neon Fundraise and LitNim are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. On pricing, Neon Fundraise offers a free tier (free_to_install) while LitNim starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Neon Fundraise audit • LitNim audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Neon Fundraise | LitNim |
|---|---|---|
| time attendance | Not ranked | #4 |
| human resources | Not ranked | #5 |
| programs | Not ranked | #6 |
| donations | #10 | Not ranked |
| donation form | #19 | Not ranked |
Neon Fundraise is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free_to_install). LitNim starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Neon Fundraise (5.0★, 10 reviews) and LitNim (5.0★, 10 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Neon Fundraise fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; LitNim is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Neon Fundraise has more onboarding documentation maturity (10 reviews vs 10), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Neon Fundraise typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (10 reviews). LitNim aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (10 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Neon Fundraise and LitNim both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LitNim" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
