Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Work with Salesforce data directly in Excel. Import, export, bulk update records, run SOQL queries, and streamline repeatable data tasks.
| XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | Flow reviewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
An effective and simple solution to compare two flow versions on your screen at the same time. Simple visualization assists you in understanding which elements were added, deleted, or changed, and an accessible log to check the data in a text version.
| Metric | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | Flow reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 228 | 5 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | freemium | free |
| Listed features | ★ 6 | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2013 | Jun 2024 |
Flow reviewer edges out XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) at freemium, Flow reviewer at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the larger user base (228 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Flow reviewer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Flow reviewer; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel)'s 228-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Flow reviewer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) audit • Flow reviewer audit
| Last updated |
|---|
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | Flow reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| data management | #2 | Not ranked |
| simple and complex | Not ranked | #5 |
| metadata management | #6 | Not ranked |
| changes over time | Not ranked | #6 |
| data and metadata | #7 | Not ranked |
Both XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) and Flow reviewer offer paid plans only. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) starts at freemium; Flow reviewer starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Flow reviewer has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) (4.8★ from 228 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Flow reviewer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the deeper published review base (228 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (228 reviews). Flow reviewer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) and Flow reviewer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flow reviewer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
