Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Work with Salesforce data directly in Excel. Import, export, bulk update records, run SOQL queries, and streamline repeatable data tasks.
| XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | Smart Field History Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
The Smart Field History Tracker is a robust solution for businesses needing to track and audit Salesforce field history records. It offers unlimited tracking capabilities & ensures you can maintain comprehensive audit trails without worrying about storage
| Metric | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | Smart Field History Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 228 | 16 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | freemium | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 6 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2013 | Dec 2022 |
Smart Field History Tracker edges out XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) offers a free tier (freemium) while Smart Field History Tracker starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the larger user base (228 reviews vs 16), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Smart Field History Tracker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Smart Field History Tracker; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel)'s 228-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Smart Field History Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) audit • Smart Field History Tracker audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | Smart Field History Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| history | Not ranked | #1 |
| field history | Not ranked | #1 |
| data management | #2 | Not ranked |
| metadata management | #6 | Not ranked |
| data and metadata | #7 | Not ranked |
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Smart Field History Tracker starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Smart Field History Tracker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 16 reviews) compared to XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) (4.8★ from 228 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Smart Field History Tracker holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the deeper published review base (228 vs 16), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (228 reviews). Smart Field History Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) and Smart Field History Tracker both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Smart Field History Tracker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
