XL-Connector | Salesforce Excel Integration and Data Management vs Streamscript

Streamscript edges out XL-Connector | Salesforce Excel Integration and Data Management on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. On pricing, XL-Connector | Salesforce Excel Integration and Data Management offers a free tier (freemium) while Streamscript starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. XL-Connector | Salesforce Excel Integration and Data Management has the larger user base (228 reviews vs 77), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Streamscript's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Streamscript; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — XL-Connector | Salesforce Excel Integration and Data Management's 228-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Streamscript's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: XL-Connector | Salesforce Excel Integration and Data Management audit • Streamscript audit

• Browse the salesforce compare hub
• Browse all salesforce apps
• Compare metrics glossary